2004 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 1,964 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 2011 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Daihatsu Naked | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Audi |
| Model | Naked | TT |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 658 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 107 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 60 L |
