2004 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daihatsu Naked | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Naked | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 107 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |