2004 Daihatsu Sirion vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Daihatsu Sirion. (72 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Daihatsu Sirion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Daihatsu Sirion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Daihatsu Sirion. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daihatsu Sirion | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Sirion | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |