2004 Dodge Caravan vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Dodge Caravan is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Caravan (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 537 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Caravan (285 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Caravan | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Caravan | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1707 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |