2004 Dodge Caravan vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Caravan (180 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 185 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Caravan (285 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Caravan | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Caravan | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3310 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1707 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 62 L |