2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | EK |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 164 Nm |
