2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1051 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Dakota | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 138 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 45 L |