2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 925 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Dakota | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 785 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 81 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2250 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 66 L |