2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (217 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 250 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar.

Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Cougar (432 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Dakota 1967 Mercury Cougar
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Dakota Cougar
Year Released 2004 1967
Body Type Pickup Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3685 cc 7003 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 217 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 432 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1930 kg 1680 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2830 mm