2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1980 Lotus Eclat. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 643 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lotus Eclat. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1980 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Dakota | Eclat |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 67 L |