2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 615 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
| Make | Dodge | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Dakota | Rancho |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 78 mm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1132 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |
