2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1981 GMC Suburban

To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GMC Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GMC Suburban would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1981 GMC Suburban. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1981 GMC Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GMC Suburban weights approximately 545 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 GMC Suburban. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 GMC Suburban.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Dakota 1981 GMC Suburban
Make Dodge GMC
Model Dakota Suburban
Year Released 2004 1981
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 4093 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 210 HP 130 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 285 Nm
Vehicle Weight 1685 kg 2230 kg
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 5480 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 3300 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]