2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1981 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1981 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 895 kg more than 1981 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 1981 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Dodge | Skoda |
| Model | Dakota | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 47 L |
