2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 620 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (154 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Dakota | Ascona |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 154 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 40 L |