2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 999 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Dakota | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2160 mm |
