2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Dakota | FTO |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
