2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 652 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Dakota | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 233 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |