2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1996 Fiat Armadillo

To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Armadillo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Armadillo would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 311 kg more than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Armadillo. (200 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Armadillo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Dakota 1996 Fiat Armadillo
Make Dodge Fiat
Model Dakota Armadillo
Year Released 2004 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 1998 cc
Horse Power 210 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 200 Nm
Number of Seats 3 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1685 kg 1374 kg
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 1850 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]