2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 830 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3685 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 55 L |