2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 1998 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 170 kg more than 1998 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 1998 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 1998 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | Falcon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 357 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 99.3 mm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 59 L |