2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 488 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | Econoline |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 3510 mm |