2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2003 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XK weights approximately 94 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2003 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Dakota | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 525 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 75 L |