2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 715 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Dakota | Smart |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |