2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1109 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 132 L |