2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2006 Isuzu I-280
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-280 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-280. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-280.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 2006 Isuzu I-280 | |
| Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
| Model | Dakota | I-280 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2770 cc |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 74 L |
