2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 145 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer (542 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dakota | Lancer |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 542 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 60 L |