2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 428 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Dakota | HR-V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1257 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 55 L |
