2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 27 kg more than 2008 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo C70. (230 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Dakota | C70 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 230 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1658 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 68 L |