2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Dakota | Ram |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3685 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 235 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 98 L |