2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2009 Lotus Elise is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Lotus Elise. (186 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 900 kg more than 2009 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lotus Elise. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lotus Elise.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2009 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Dakota | Elise |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 133 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 11.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 38 L |