2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,980 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL (661 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 451 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 320 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL (1,000 Nm) has 681 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2009 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Dakota | SL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 661 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1365 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 80 L |