2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Raider. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Raider. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider weights approximately 108 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 319 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2009 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dakota | Raider |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 83 L |