2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2009 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 710 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Suzuki Equator.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Dakota 2009 Suzuki Equator
Make Dodge Suzuki
Model Dakota Equator
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 2501 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 150 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 171 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 9.5:1
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1685 kg 975 kg
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 3200 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.8 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.9 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.2 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 80 L