2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 BMW 125

To start off, 2010 BMW 125 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 125 (215 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 125 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 342 kg more than 2010 BMW 125.

Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 BMW 125. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 125. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 125.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Dodge Dakota 2010 BMW 125
Make Dodge BMW
Model Dakota 125
Year Released 2004 2010
Body Type Pickup Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 2996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 319 Nm 271 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 6 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1867 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1420 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 3340 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 83 L 53 L