2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 BMW 128
To start off, 2010 BMW 128 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 128 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 128 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 162 kg more than 2010 BMW 128.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 128. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 128.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2010 BMW 128 | |
Make | Dodge | BMW |
Model | Dakota | 128 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 271 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2659 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 53 L |