2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2010 Chrysler 300. (178 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2010 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Chrysler 300. (257 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Dodge | Chrysler |
Model | Dakota | 300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 257 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 68 L |