2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 Dodge Avenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Avenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Avenger. (225 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2010 Dodge Avenger | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Dakota | Avenger |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 225 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1496 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |