2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | Epica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
