2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2010 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2010 Nissan GT-R is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan GT-R (485 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 275 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 10 kg more than 2010 Nissan GT-R.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan GT-R (588 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2010 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Dakota | GT-R |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3685 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 485 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 588 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 74 L |