2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac STS weights approximately 55 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2011 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Dodge | Cadillac |
Model | Dakota | STS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 368 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |