2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. (155 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 316 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Dodge | Chevrolet |
Model | Dakota | HHR |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 203 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1747 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2629 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 61 L |