2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2011 Hyundai i20 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2011 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2011 Hyundai i20.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Hyundai i20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Hyundai i20. (220 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Dodge | Hyundai |
Model | Dakota | i20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 17:01 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 3.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |