2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Dakota | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 219 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 50 L |