2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Citroen C5
To start off, 2012 Citroen C5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C5. (208 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Citroen C5 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C5. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Citroen C5 | |
Make | Dodge | Citroen |
Model | Dakota | C5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 71 L |