2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 190 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (400 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Dakota | C30 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 60 L |
