2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 BMW X5 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 M is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 337 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 M weights approximately 794 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X5 M (678 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X5 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2013 BMW X5 M | |
Make | Dodge | BMW |
Model | Dakota | X5 M |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 678 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 2435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2197 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1764 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 85 L |