2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (170 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 165 kg more than 2013 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (224 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Dakota | Compass |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 224 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 97 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 51 L |