2004 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 286 kg more than 2004 Dodge Dakota. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 366 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1641 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 76 L |