2004 Dodge Durango vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (230 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Durango (393 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Durango | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Durango | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 393 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |