2004 Dodge Durango vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Dodge Durango would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 199 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Durango. (319 Nm). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Dodge Durango | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Durango | CLS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 630 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 11.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2119 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 80 L |